Mary E Fissell, The Lancet, Volume 407, Issue 10527
January 31, 2026
In June, 2022, the US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization ended five decades of legal abortion access in the country. Now about half of the 50 US states severely limit or ban abortion. Tragically, those states have seen a spate of preventable deaths from pregnancy complications for which abortion is usually the standard of care. Scholars in a range of disciplines are looking again at the history of abortion, trying to understand past events and their legacies.
In Back-Alley Abortion: A Rhetorical History, Emily Winderman examines the phrase back-alley abortion to denote the bad old days when almost all abortions in the USA were performed illegally. A researcher of the rhetoric of medicine and health, her book combines technical analyses of language and historical research, including a prehistory of purity dialogues; media treatments of specific abortion scandals; and legal cases. Analysis of this rhetoric is valuable as abortion debates continue to be sites of contest over language. Winderman argues that rhetoric about back-alley abortion connects “individual embodied experiences, history, and public memory”.
Continued: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00155-8/fulltext?rss=yes