An ambitious attempt at a history of abortion from antiquity to today is valuable and interesting, but does not consider the structures behind the patterns of change, argues Elaine Graham-Leigh
17 July 2025
Elaine Graham-Leigh
Mary Fissell, Abortion: A History (Hurst & Company, 2025), vii, 288pp.Mary Fissell, Abortion: A History (Hurst & Company, 2025), vii, 288pp.
Throughout European history, women have sought to end their pregnancies. Against this constant, the attitude taken to abortion by authorities has fluctuated, with periods of repression vying with periods where abortion is accepted or at least tolerated. Fissell’s history of abortion in Europe and in America after colonisation attempts to track the ebbs and flows of repression and toleration of abortion from the ancient world to the present day.
For Fissell, the shifts for and against in attitudes to abortion over the centuries are linked to ‘larger shifts in gender relations, in the ways a society expects men and women to behave’ (p.4). This formulation doesn’t quite express the clear connection between repression of abortion and the control of the reproduction of labour through women’s oppression, seeming to reduce it to culture or interpersonal relations. It is true, as Fissell states, that ‘abortion restriction has often been gender backlash’ (p.4) but locating it purely in cultural attitudes to women’s behaviour has the effect of hiding the structural nature of abortion restriction as part of women’s oppression.
Continued: https://www.counterfire.org/article/abortion-a-history-book-review/